New Art Project Allows People to Adopt Pieces of Space Junk That Will Tweet at Them

Image credit: 

It’s hard to think of the boundlessness of space as cluttered, but an interactive art project aims to illustrate the real danger of something most of us have never given much thought to: space junk.

Most of the known pieces of space junk out there—around 670,000 examples—measure between 1 and 10 centimeters, while about 29,000 come in at over 10. But don’t let the size fool you; it’s the speed that’s the real danger. Earlier this year, the European Space Agency reported that possibly a paint chip or metal fragment “a few thousandths of a millimeter across” put a 7mm crack in the Cupola’s window on the International Space Station. When traveling at thousands of miles per hour, even a flake can lead to catastrophe.

That’s why documentary filmmaker Cath Le Couteur and musician Nick Ryan have created “Adrift,” an art project meant to highlight the real danger of space junk, as reported by Motherboard. Along with London’s Royal Astronomical Society, the duo created a three-pronged effort to talk about space debris through art: Adopt, listen, and watch.

For those interested, you can “adopt” one of three pieces of space junk by following the debris on Twitter. The first is SuitSat, a Russian spacesuit filled with garbage and fitted with a radio that was thrown out of the ISS in 2006. The second is the United States’s Vanguard I, the oldest satellite in orbit. The last one is the Chinese weather satellite Fengyun, which was blown apart in a weapons test in 2007; however, that act nearly doubled the amount of space debris currently in existence.

By following these space junk Twitter accounts, you can message them and they’ll actually reply to you with a status update. Though the results might be a little horrifying. Or a lot horrifying:

The listening portion of this art project comes courtesy of the Machine 9, which “tracks the positions of 27,000 pieces of space junk, transforming them into sound, in real time, as they pass overhead.” You can listen to the otherworldly music below:

Then there’s the documentary by Le Couteur, which goes into further detail about the dangers of debris in space and how the future might play out if we don’t listen to these warnings. (Hint: things won’t go particularly well.) You can check out the documentary below, and visit the Adrift site for even more information on an issue that everyone should be paying a lot more attention to.

[h/t: Motherboard]


November 25, 2016 – 2:00am

7 Ways Lighting Can Make Your Home Happier

Image credit: 
iStock

Lighting is more important than it might seem. Besides being functional, the light fixtures, lamps, and sconces in your home can add style to your abode and create a cozy vibe. But lighting can also affect your emotions in complex ways, impacting everything from your mood to your productivity. Take a look at these seven ways you can use lighting to make your home a happier place.

1. BRIGHT LIGHTING CAN HELP YOU FOCUS.

Although most people dislike living and working under harsh, fluorescent ceiling lights, some type of bright lighting is essential when you need to be alert and focused. Bright light stimulates your brain and increases serotonin levels, which can help you concentrate. So if you’re working from home or paying your bills, make sure your ambient lighting is bright enough to energize you and help you focus. Consider using halogen, LED, or compact fluorescent bulbs in your home.

2. DIMMER SWITCHES CAN IMPROVE YOUR SLEEP.

When it’s dark, your brain’s pineal gland secretes melatonin to promote sleep and regulate your body’s sleep-wake cycle. Spending time in bright light in the evening can interfere with your natural cycle, wreaking havoc on the quality of your sleep and overall health. To help your brain and body wind down in the evening, dim the lights and use energy-efficient light bulbs. Besides using a dimmer switch, try to avoid staring at your devices. Studies have shown that the short-wavelength blue light emitted from phones and computers interferes with your circadian rhythm, making it harder to sleep.

3. TASK LIGHTING CAN HELP YOU AVOID EYE STRAIN.

Whether you’re applying makeup, chopping onions, or reading in bed, task lighting allows you to better see exactly what you’re doing. Having an additional, focused source of light also improves the contrast between the object you’re directing your attention to and the surrounding environment, helping you avoid eye strain and headaches. To achieve ideal task lighting in your home, put a reading lamp on your nightstand and desk, and make sure that your bathroom mirror, kitchen counters, and dining room table are adequately lit.

4. BRIGHT LIGHTING CAN MAKE YOU FEEL WARMER.

According to a series of studies, bright light can make people feel as though they’re warmer, even when the temperature of the room stays the same. So to feel warmer on a cold day, turn on all the lights in your home. But be aware that feeling warmer seems to also heighten whatever emotion you’re feeling, whether it’s happiness, excitement, sadness, or anxiety. When participants were under bright lighting, they rated people as more attractive, reported that they liked spicier sauce on chicken wings, and reacted more strongly to positive and negative words. In other words, the bright light increased the intensity of their emotional response as well as making them feel physically warmer.

5. LETTING IN MORE NATURAL LIGHT CAN STAVE OFF DEPRESSION.

A 2006 report explained the link between sunlight, our circadian rhythms, and mood. People with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) experience depression during the fall and winter months because their serotonin levels drop when there’s less sunlight. Even if you don’t have SAD, less exposure to sunlight can also mess with your melatonin levels and circadian rhythm, causing you to become sleep-deprived and grumpy. To maximize your home’s natural light and keep your serotonin levels up, position mirrors next to or across from windows to bring in sunlight, and clean your windows to let the most sunlight through.

6. ACCENT LIGHTING CAN LET YOU SHOWCASE YOUR FAVORITE THINGS.

Most art museums make ample use of accent lighting to illuminate paintings and sculptures. Even if you don’t have valuable art pieces in your home, you can still use accent lighting to draw people’s eyes to whatever you want to show off—whether that’s a vase, plant, fireplace, or your collection of baseball cards. To highlight your favorite things in your home, consider installing track lighting or mounting picture lights on the wall.

7. CANDLES AND TWINKLE LIGHTS CAN MAKE YOUR HOME COZIER.

To make your home an expression of your personality, taste, and style, get creative with your lighting. Beyond choosing floor and desk lamps in colors and designs that complement your home, consider using additional sources of light such as candles, twinkle lights, night lights, or DIY Mason jar lamps. These decorative light sources can make your home feel cozy, mellow, and warm. Let there be light!


November 25, 2016 – 12:00am

10 Creative Recipes to Make With Your Thanksgiving Leftovers

Image credit: 
Butter With a Side of Bread

A traditional Thanksgiving dinner is the meal that keeps on giving. If you’re feeling overwhelmed by the leftovers filling your fridge, here are 10 resourceful recipes to give you some post-Turkey Day inspiration. 

1. SAVORY CREPES WITH TURKEY AND STUFFING

If you’re not out shopping all Friday morning, reward yourself with these savory Thanksgiving crepes from the blog Butter with a Side of Bread. The insides are filled with leftover stuffing and strips of turkey, and then topped off with a drizzle of gravy and cranberry sauce. The recipe even makes use of your leftover mashed potatoes by incorporating them into the batter for the crepes themselves.

2. TURKEY POT PIE SOUP

Handle the Heat

A fast way to get rid of any excess leftover turkey is to transform it into a soup. This turkey pot pie soup from the blog Handle the Heat takes only 30 minutes to cook, and it will provide you with quick and easy meals for the rest of the holiday weekend. The addition of fresh sage is the perfect way to prolong the flavors of fall—even when it starts to feel like winter outside.

3. MASHED POTATO AND STUFFING PATTIES

Pocket Change Gourmet

What’s the best way to re-purpose the starchy sides leftover from Thanksgiving? By pressing them into patties and frying them, of course. In addition to using stuffing and mashed potatoes, these patties from Pocket Change Gourmet also call for leftover turkey, so they’re substantial enough to be eaten as a snack or a meal.

4. THANKSGIVING LEFTOVERS STROMBOLI

Betsy Life

Thanksgiving sandwiches start to get old after the third or fourth time you make them. If you’re in search of something a little more innovative to do with your leftovers, try stuffing them into a stromboli. This glorious creation from the blog Betsy Life includes turkey, cranberry sauce, stuffing, and mashed potatoes, all braided inside a golden-brown crust. The recipe uses pre-made pizza dough, so putting it together takes even less effort than you’d think.

5. THANKSGIVING LEFTOVER CASSEROLE

Favorite Family Recipes

This casserole from Family Friendly Recipes has it all. Just layer your turkey, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy, stuffing, and cranberry sauce into a baking dish and 40 minutes later you’ll have a dish that delivers that perfect Thanksgiving taste all in one bite.

6. FRIED MASHED POTATO BALLS

Spicy Southern Kitchen

It’s easy to overlook the sad bowl of leftover mashed potatoes sitting in the corner of your fridge. This recipe from Spicy Southern Kitchen injects new life into your old mashers with healthy heapings of bacon, cheddar, green onion, and jalapeños. Roll the mixture together into 1-inch balls and fry them for a delicious bite-sized snack.

7. STUFFING SANDWICH

Most conventional Thanksgiving sandwiches include stuffing between the bread. In this sandwich from Sporkful, the stuffing is the bread. By binding the leftover stuffing with egg, it can then be formed into slice-like patties and fried up to crispy perfection. The stuffing buns make the perfect vehicles for all the classic sandwich components like turkey, mashed potatoes, and cranberry sauce.

8. PUMPKIN PIE MILKSHAKE

Blogging Over Thyme

Some pumpkin milkshake recipes call for pumpkin puree, or perhaps a scoop of pumpkin ice-cream. This leftover thanksgiving pumpkin pie milkshake from Blogging Over Thyme recipe requires a whole slice of pie. A thermos full of this stuff might make the Monday after Thanksgiving a little more bearable.

9. TURKEY AND SWEET POTATO ENCHILADAS

This is How I Cook

For a Mexican spin on the all-American flavors of Thanksgiving, use your leftover turkey meat as stuffing for enchiladas. The baked sweet potatoes emphasize the fall flavor profile and smoky chipotle sauce adds an extra spicy kick.

10. THANKSGIVING LEFTOVER PIZZA 

When looking for a tasty leftover vehicle, it’s hard to go wrong with pizza. This recipe for turkey, mashed potato, and mushroom pizza steps out of the box by swapping out the pizza sauce for gravy. That sounds like a brilliant idea no matter what time of the year it is.


November 25, 2016 – 12:00am

The Sweet and Not-So-Sweet History of Saccharin

Image credit: 

Raysonho via Wikimedia Commons // Public Domain 

When it was first introduced to the public, saccharin seemed to be a miracle. The substance is about 300 times as sweet as sugar, and it doesn’t have any calories. What’s not to love about that?

But not everything in saccharin’s history is sweet. The story of the sugar substitute begins in the labs of Johns Hopkins University, where Dr. Ira Remsen became the first chemistry professor in 1876. One of his earliest laboratory residents was postdoctoral student Constantin Fahlberg, a Russian chemist whom Remsen met when the H.W. Perot Import Firm hired both of them to research sugar impurities.

In 1878, Remsen and Fahlberg were working on various products derived from coal tar. One night that June, Fahlberg worked late in the lab and went home to his supper in a hurry, neglecting to wash his hands. The bread he ate was unusually sweet, and so was his drink. Even his napkin tasted sweet. Eventually Fahlberg realized that he was sipping his drink from an area of his cup that his fingers had touched. He tasted his thumb, and then ran back to the laboratory to work on the newly discovered “coal tar sugar,” which he named saccharin.

Fahlberg and Remsen co-authored research papers on saccharin over the next few years, but Fahlberg struck out on his own when he obtained a German patent for the compound in 1884, followed by a series of American patents. Remsen was upset that Fahlberg applied for the patent on his own: He wasn’t all that interested in the commercial production of saccharin, but felt it important that his contribution to the discovery be acknowledged. Remsen was especially incensed at how Fahlberg’s account of the discovery neglected to even mention the lead researcher.

Fahlberg opened a saccharin factory near Magdeburg, Germany, and another in the U.S. While saccharin sold well enough to make Fahlberg a wealthy man, sales went mostly to food manufacturers who used it as an additive. Consumers bought saccharin, too, but not as much, since regular sugar was readily available and didn’t have the metallic aftertaste of saccharin.

Saccharin had its fans, however—including one in the White House. Theodore Roosevelt was president when the Pure Food and Drug Act, designed to protect the public from food adulteration and unsafe ingredients, was passed in 1906. Harvey Wiley, the chief chemist for the USDA, was charged with investigating dangerous foods. But when he broached the subject of the safety of saccharin in 1908, he hit a sore spot with the president. Roosevelt’s doctor had prescribed a sugar-free diet, and Roosevelt used saccharin in its place. Wiley described saccharin as “… a coal tar product totally devoid of food value and extremely injurious to health.”

Roosevelt was insulted. His response: “Anybody who says saccharin is injurious to health is an idiot.” The remark proved to be the end of the two men’s personal relationship.

In 1912, the use of saccharin was banned in the manufacture of processed foods, but it was still sold to consumers as a stand-alone product. Diabetics and people wishing to lose weight regularly purchased saccharin—but when a sugar shortage caused a massive price increase during World War I, its use really exploded. The same thing happened during World War II.

Meanwhile, the question of saccharin’s safety wasn’t fully settled. In the 1950s, another sugar substitute called cyclamate was approved for sale. A combination of cyclamate and saccharin proved very popular, in part because the cyclamate canceled out the bitter aftertaste of the saccharin. The new combination led to a boom in diet soft drinks, until two 1968 studies indicating that cyclamate caused bladder cancer in laboratory rats prompted the FDA to ban the sweetener.

National Cancer Institute via Wikimedia Commons // Public Domain

A 1970 study showed some disturbing evidence of saccharin also causing bladder cancer in rats, and the substance was banned in 1977. This time, food manufacturers, lobbyists, and consumers immediately fought back, wary of losing their last artificial sweetener. The ban was soon changed to a warning, and labels were added to products that contained saccharin.

However, later studies showed that the increased incidence of bladder cancer was only applicable to rats, due to their particular biology. The results of the earlier studies were not transferable to humans. In 2000, saccharin was taken off the government’s list of known carcinogens, and the warning labels were discontinued. While other sugar substitutes have since been developed, saccharin still remains one of the most popular. Sold under the brand names Sweet’N Low, Sweet Twin, NectaSweet, and others, it accounted for 70 percent of the world demand for artificial sweeteners as of 2001, with world sales totaling hundreds of millions of dollars [PDF].


November 24, 2016 – 10:00pm

How An Obscure British Comedy Sketch Became The World’s Most Repeated TV Program

filed under: Comedy, tv
Image credit: 
iStock / Norddeutscher Rundfunk

The Simpsons recently cemented its title as America’s longest-running primetime scripted series with the announcement of seasons 29 and 30. For a time, Baywatch was the world’s most syndicated program, sold to 148 countries and a weekly global audience of over a billion people. And in 1983, up to 125 million people (an unprecedented 77 percent audience share) watched “Goodbye, Farewell and Amen,” the last ever episode of M*A*S*H. But when it comes to the single most repeated program in history, that title is claimed by none of television’s biggest names, but by an obscure British comedy sketch, filmed in 1963 with a cast of two, that has gained a cult audience all over the world.

The two stars in question were British comedian Freddie Frinton and 72-year-old actress May Warden. Frinton first made a name for himself in the music halls and variety shows of wartime Britain, and after World War II added a sketch to his show entitled “Dinner For One.”

In the sketch he plays James, a butler, employed by Miss Sophie, played by Warden, an upper class woman who is celebrating her 90th birthday with a fine banquet. Sadly, Miss Sophie has long outlived her four closest friends—Sir Toby, Admiral von Schneider, Mr. Pommeroy and Mr. Winterbottom—but places are set at her dinner table regardless, with James valiantly stepping in to impersonate each one.

As each of the four courses are served—with Miss Sophie explaining each time that the pair will follow the “same procedure as every year” —James tops up the four missing guests’ glasses, toasts Miss Sophie’s health, and downs them all. And needless to say, by the end of the meal (and after four glasses of sherry, four glasses of white wine, four glasses of champagne, and four glasses of port) James is slightly the worse for wear. At the end of the sketch, as they’re going up to Miss Sophie’s bedroom, James asks, “Same procedure as last year?” and Miss Sophie replies, “Same procedure as every year.” James responds, “Well, I’ll do my very best,”—a very risqué move at the time.

“Dinner For One” was originally written in the 1920s by English author and scriptwriter Lauri Wylie, but it proved so popular with his audiences that Frinton eventually bought the rights to it and continued to perform it as part of his show for the next seven years. Then, during a tour of English seaside resorts in 1962, a German entertainer and television star named Peter Frankenfeld happened to see Frinton and Warden performing the sketch in Blackpool and asked if they would like to reproduce it as part of his TV show, Guten Abend. The following year, the pair travelled to Germany and filmed it in English—though under the German title “Der 90 Geburtstag,” or “The 90th Birthday”— in front of a live studio audience; by then, the pair were so used to the material that it took just one take to get a flawless recording.

But how did such an unassuming sketch become the Guinness World Records’ most repeated TV show ever?

Well, besides proving immediately popular with Frankenfeld’s audience, part of the skit’s success lies in Frinton’s expert physical comedy (which needs no subtitles and so works across the language boundary) and partly in its short running time, which for many years made it the perfect short to fill time between broadcasts. After being used sporadically as little more than a time-filler over the next decade, in 1972, German television network Norddeutscher Rundfunk decided to schedule it at 6 p.m. on New Year’s Eve. The viewers loved it, and a now annual tradition was established.

“Dinner For One” has been shown every New Year’s Eve in Germany since, and has established itself as such a traditional part of the country’s New Year celebrations that Miss Sophie’s catchphrase is now familiar to practically all native German speakers: In 1996, an opposition finance minister even accused his opponent of adopting “the same procedure as every year” in the German parliament.

More recently, others countries have gotten in on the tradition, and “Dinner For One” has now established itself as a New Year’s tradition in the likes of Denmark, Austria, and Sweden; as a pre-Christmas tradition in Norway, where it’s broadcast annually on December 23; and has amassed a cult following in countries as far afield as Estonia and South Africa. “Dinner For One” has since racked up more than 200 individual broadcasts (it was reportedly shown 19 times on different German networks on New Year’s Eve 2003 alone), easily taking the title as the world’s most-repeated television program. Although ironically, for such a quintessentially British sketch, it has yet to be shown in its entirety on British television …


November 24, 2016 – 8:00pm

20 Eerie Images of an Abandoned Shopping Mall

Weeks ahead of its scheduled demolition, photographer Seph Lawless got a last look at what has become of Kansas City’s Metro North Mall in the two years since its closure.


Jennifer M Wood


Thursday, November 24, 2016 – 18:00

Rich Title: 
20 Eerie Images of an Abandoned Shopping Mall
Article Icon: 
Schedule Publish: 
Content not scheduled for publishing.
Exclude Slideshow Mode: 
Infographic: 
Universal Credit: 
All images courtesy of Seph Lawless
Exclude from mobile site: 
0
Intro Text: 

An empty shopping mall isn’t something you see too often at this time of year, but photographer Seph Lawless isn’t interested in easily observed sights. Over the years, we’ve shared many of his haunting photo series of abandoned places—including homes, amusement parks, a Disney water park, and, yes, shopping malls. It’s that Orange Julius-happy staple of 20th-century consumerism that has fueled Lawless’s latest project: A new photo book, Autopsy of America: The Death of a Nation, that’s slated for an April 2017 release, but is currently available for pre-order on Amazon.

Lawless shared some images from Kansas City’s Metro North Mall. According to The Pitch, the shopping mall, which is scheduled to be demolished in a few weeks, “was a rockin’ spot in the 1980s. It closed in 2014, and the property will be redeveloped soon, possibly with a Trader Joe’s in the mix.” But Lawless describes it as “by far the creepiest mall I’ve been in.” See for yourself in the photo gallery below.

More of Lawless’s work can be viewed on his Website, or by following him on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

When Richard Nixon Wanted to be a Rapper

Image credit: 
Getty Images

Before Bill Clinton jammed on a saxophone with Arsenio Hall’s band and before Barack Obama sang a few verses of “Let’s Stay Together,” another president voiced his strange and highly unlikely recording ambitions: Richard Nixon once admitted he wanted to become a rapper.

The undated confession was rediscovered during a 1997 tour through the Nixon Presidential Library in Yorba Linda, California by a Washington Post reporter, who was listening to one of the many recordings the president—who resigned in 1974 amid the Watergate scandal—made both in and out of office. In it, the former president said:

“I have often thought that if there had been a good rap group around in those days, I might have chosen a career in music instead of politics.”

Years prior, the idea of the staid, stolid Nixon freestyling verse led to various media outlets coining his possible stage names: Trik-E-Dik was one standout. But it wasn’t quite as unlikely a concept as it may have seemed. As a child, Nixon’s mother, Hannah, bought him several instruments, including a piano, clarinet, saxophone, accordion, and violin; young Nixon practiced the piano every day after school. He even appeared on The Jack Paar Program in 1963 to perform a piano concerto that he wrote himself:

Nixon died in 1994, just a few years after the quote surfaced, but never addressed it directly.

In 1990, Spy magazine asked Kid of the popular duo Kid ‘n Play what a Nixon rap performance would look like. “I see him as a solo rapper and he’d probably have, like, two dancers,” he said. “They’d probably be dressed in some intelligence uniforms, some Watergate break-in uniforms … he’s good at cutting, particularly tape.”


November 24, 2016 – 4:00pm

The Time an Engineer Accidentally Started the Space Race and Changed the Course of History

filed under: books, History, space
Image credit: 
Amazon/iStock

We tend to look back on the white-hot 12 years between Sputnik I and Neil Armstrong and say, “Well of course the United States won the Space Race,” but the fog of history obscures the uncertainties of how it would all end. For much of the Space Race, not only was the Soviet Union ahead, but ahead by giant leaps. This is because of a brilliant, mysterious Soviet engineer whose public identity was simply “the Chief Designer.” Revealed only after his death to be a rocket scientist named Sergei Korolev, not only did he fly circles—literally—around the American space program, but he has the distinction of having tricked the Soviet leadership into kicking off what would eventually become the space race. Here is how he did it, as described by Matthew Brzezinski in his magnificent book Red Moon Rising: Sputnik and the Hidden Rivalries That Ignited the Space Age.

A CHEAPER WAY OF WAR

The Soviet Union was, in short, broke, which made difficult its bitter Cold War with the United States. The Soviets simply lacked the funds to maintain the kind of massive standing army necessary to go to war with the Americans at a moment’s notice. Their detonation of the atomic bomb leveled the playing field a bit, but the Americans had overwhelming air superiority that included massive B-47 bombers flying every minute. The sheer brazenness of American bomber deployment and the scope of their exercises made Soviet leadership fear that the Americans might actually be serious about war.

After the defeat of Germany in World War II, the world’s powers pillaged German scientific and engineering files, prying open “high-quality steel laboratory doors” and literally stepping over the bodies of dead Germans to seize schematics, mockups, and prototypes of the most advanced rocketry program in the world. The Soviets took what they found (far less than the Americans had managed to secure) and made rapid strides, first matching the stolen German rockets and slowly surpassing them. The Chief Designer’s first real breakthrough—the R-5 rocket—was one ton lighter than those of the Germans and capable of holding 60 percent more fuel while producing 60 percent more thrust. The rocket had a range of 800 miles and could hold a warhead six times that of the Hiroshima bomb. As one might imagine, this greatly interested the leadership of the Soviet Union.

When Korolev personally unveiled his rocket to members of the Soviet Presidium, he had two goals, one secret and one obvious. He very overtly wanted them to believe in rockets as a method of waging war, and the presidium was onboard almost without reservation. Marveling at the R-5, it seemed incomprehensible to them that “such a strange, fragile object could wield such power; that with one push of a button it could vaporize an entire city in an instant.” Missile warfare meant that “you didn’t need planes, tanks, or troops, or an invasion fleet”; all of Europe (but for Spain and Portugal) was within its range, and five missiles could “destroy all of England.”

The Chief Designer’s missile immediately countered the American tactical advantage in the air—and did so for bargain bin prices. And that wasn’t even the best of it. The Chief Designer had a new rocket in development called the R-7: the world’s first intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of achieving 450 tons of thrust. (The German rockets taken after the war had a mere 27.) The Soviet officials—Premier Nikita Khrushchev among them—were awestruck.

This is when the Chief Designer made his move to set his secret plan into motion. He brought the men into an adjacent room and unveiled a strange model on a table—something called a “satellite.” He launched into an impassioned speech about humanity’s quest to escape the bonds of Earth, and that with a few modifications, the R-7 could actually help achieve this dream. The Soviet leadership was unimpressed. Who cared? They wanted to bring thermonuclear devastation to Washington.

Faced with this brick wall, the Chief Designer lied. The Americans, he said, were on the verge of launching one of their very own, and how great would it be to demonstrate superior Soviet scientific strength than by beating the Americans to the punch? All it would take was launching an R-7 missile with the satellite on board instead of a warhead, he explained. Again, the bait was not taken. So he again lied—or at least, exaggerated greatly—adding that the satellite would in no way interfere with the development of the missile.

Korolev, the Chief Designer, had long dreamed of launching an “artificial moon,” but had been struck down every step of the way. The problem was the Soviet bureaucracy. At every level, someone could say no to what amounted to a silly, purposeless hurling of metal into space—and at every level, they did. But now, with Khrushchev in the room, he could neutralize and bypass the entire bureaucracy.

“If the main task doesn’t suffer, do it,” said the Soviet premier.

THE MAIN TASK, SUFFERING

The Chief Designer now had to deliver. Khrushchev believed all of Korolev’s promises, and began slashing the expensive Soviet military, which would no longer be needed in this age of missile warfare. What the Chief Designer had failed to mention was that the R-7 was nowhere near ready to launch. It had serious stabilization problems, thermal problems, friction problems, fuel problems—even launch pad problems (specifically: no launch pad existed that could handle such a massive missile). Worse yet, its nose cone was incapable of surviving reentry, which rendered it worthless as a weapon. (The warhead would be destroyed on reentry.)

The first R-7 missile finally launched in 1957. It flew for less than two minutes and crashed. Though pressure was building, the Chief Designer was optimistic. First launches always failed, he knew. But the following month, the second launch failed, too. This time, it didn’t launch at all, simply coughing a lot of smoke and falling silent. The launch one month later did take flight—for 33 seconds—before disintegrating.

Only three things saved Korolev from a terrible fate. First, the American rocket program was mired in the sort of bureaucratic infighting that the Chief Designer had managed to avoid. Specifically, the U.S. Army and Air Force had competing missile programs, and undercut each other at every turn, with Congress and the Defense Department each doing their parts to make things more difficult for missile designers. American officials, meanwhile, dismissed rumors of a Soviet manmade moon, and felt no pressure to launch one of their own. As Brzezinski notes in his book, “Russia couldn’t possibly smuggle a suitcase bomb into the United States, went one popular punchline, because the Soviets hadn’t yet perfected the suitcase.” Spaceships were simply laughably beyond Soviet reach. Second, the catastrophic Budapest Uprising distracted the Soviet leadership from paying much attention to the early R-7 failures. Third was an attempted coup d’état against Khrushchev. Settling scores in the aftermath preoccupied his time, leaving the latest R-7 disaster almost unnoticed.

SEEN AND HEARD

The fourth launch of the R-7 was a success, with a caveat: The thermal protection on its nose cone failed, destroying the dummy warhead on reentry. Still, that could be corrected, and anyway, it had no effect on the Chief Designer’s real purpose: the satellite, which wouldn’t have to survive reentry, as it would be fired into orbit. At last in possession of a rocket that worked, Korolev was ready to launch his satellite—only to be rejected by the state commission overseeing the R-7 program.

Their reasons were myriad. Unlike Khrushchev, the commissioners knew specifically that the satellite would delay the “main task” of getting a thermonuclear bomb over Washington, D.C. Worse, rockets weren’t cheap, and there weren’t enough supplies to waste an R-7 on the distracting toy of a petulant engineer. Moreover, until the R-7 nose cone was perfected, the nuclear armaments chief couldn’t test a live warhead, which meant his own progress was being held up. The ground control officers didn’t want to reorient their monitoring stations; their hardware was designed for weapons of war and very specific trajectories—not “satellites” and orbits.

Trajectories especially mattered because Korolev wanted his satellite seen, and this would require careful calculations using the Soviet Union’s most powerful computer. He wanted it visible in the night sky over the United States. It’s why he chose the construction material (“highly reflective aluminum … polished to a mirrorlike sheen”) and its shape (spherical, so that it would catch the light better). He wanted no doubt that he had done it—that he had placed an object in space and that it was actually orbiting the Earth. It had to be seen. And when it wasn’t seen, he wanted it heard. This, too, annoyed Soviet officials—this time in academia. The satellite’s payload would not be scientific, but rather, redundant radio transmitters that sent out little pulses. “Hearing,” writes Brzezinski, “was also believing.”

Korolev had no way of mollifying the Soviet bureaucracy. The nose cone problem could take months if not years to solve, leaving Korolev dead in the water, yet so close to his true goal.

MUSIC NO ONE HAS EVER HEARD BEFORE

Just when hope seemed lost, a second consecutive and largely perfect R-7 test went off, and Korolev again had the attention of Khrushchev. Though the nose cone melted as usual, that the rocket could be said to launch reliably was vindication for Khrushchev, who had bet his nation’s security on rocketry and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The Chief Designer was more Khrushchev’s man than ever, and whatever the Chief Designer wanted, the Chief Designer would get. Immediately, opposition to the satellite launch scurried in opposite directions, with officials worried suddenly that: 1. The United States might launch a satellite first, and 2. Khrushchev would then demand to know who interfered with the Chief Designer’s efforts to get there first.

“Simple Satellite 1″—or Sputnik, as it was called—launched on October 4, 1957. When its tracking signal was received at the mission’s control room, cheers erupted, though there was hesitation: it still had to orbit the planet. It would take an hour and a half before the signal resumed, the Earth having now been circled. They had done it. “This is music no one has ever heard before,” Korolev said at the time.

Few at the time understood the significance of Sputnik. It’s possible Eisenhower wasn’t even briefed on it the night it made its first orbit. The official White House response thereafter incorrectly credited German rocket engines for the achievement, and dismissed the very utility of a satellite, noting that its “value … to mankind will for a long time be highly problematical.” The secretary of defense called it “a silly bauble.” A commander of the American rocket program called it a “hunk of iron that almost anyone could launch.” (In fact, it would take almost five months and multiple public failures by the American space program before they could repeat Sputnik’s success.)

Whatever American officials said publicly, Sputnik’s signal simply could not be downplayed or ignored. The beeps were broadcast on NBC, the evening anchor saying, “Listen now for the sound that will forever more separate the old from the new.” Ham radio enthusiasts monitored it. Amateur astronomers every evening attempted to find and follow glints of light on the first artificial moon to cross the night sky. Neither the United States nor the Soviet Union intended to enter a space race—it all started because one man was obsessed with getting there first. Nobody predicted that the event would eventually transform political priorities in the United States, and as Red Moon Rising details, would dominate global affairs for the next 20 years.


November 24, 2016 – 2:00pm

20 Future Stars Who Appeared on ‘Gilmore Girls’

filed under: tv
Image credit: 
YouTube

Over the course of its seven-year run, Gilmore Girls introduced many future stars. Some even played multiple characters on the show before making it big. 

1. Jon Hamm // “Peyton Sanders”

The future Don Draper’s biggest role prior to Gilmore Girls was a recurring part in the TV series Providence (which apparently didn’t pay very well—the actor has said in interviews that he kept his job as a waiter for the year he was on the show). In the season three episode “Eight O’Clock at the Oasis,” Hamm played Peyton Sanders; his character met Lorelai at an auction. They went on one date, but she had a miserable time (off camera).

2. Max Greenfield // “Lucas”

Max Greenfield had appeared on two TV shows before he played Lucas in the season four episode “Chicken or Beef?” He attended Dean’s bachelor party and tells Luke, “Hey, my name’s Luke, too. We should start a club or something.” After Gilmore Girls, Greenfield played a romantic interest for Veronica Mars for a couple of seasons, a role he reprised in the 2014 film. For four years, he has starred on New Girl as Schmidt.

3. Alex Borstein // “Drella,” “Miss Celine,” and “Doris”

Borstein, who at the time was appearing on MADtv, was originally cast as Gilmore Girls’ Sookie. But when Melissa McCarthy took over that role, Borstein was given the opportunity to play three different characters. She was the Independence Inn’s sassy harpist, Drella, in four season one episodes, and played Emily’s stylist in the later seasons. She also provided the voice for Doris in the season three episode “Eight O’Clock at the Oasis.”

Since wrapping up MADtv in 2009, Borstein has starred in A Million Ways to Die in the West and Shameless. She also voices Lois on Family Guy

4. Chad Michael Murray // “Tristan Dugray” 

Chad Michael Murray had just a few roles under his belt when he played Rory’s rich Chilton classmate, who definitely had a thing for her, in the first season of Gilmore Girls. He left Gilmore Girls to do a season of Dawson’s Creek, then played Lucas Scott on One Tree Hill for six seasons. Now, he appears on Agent Carter as Jack Thompson.

5. Seth MacFarlane // “Zach” and “Bob Merriam”

MacFarlane had already created and premiered Family Guy when he took on his first live-action role as Zach, a business school student who graduated alongside Lorelai in the season two episode “Lorelai’s Graduation Day.” Later, he played Emily’s lawyer, Bob Merriam, in the season three episode “I Solemnly Swear.” Since Gilmore Girls, MacFarlane has created American Dad and The Cleveland Show, and he wrote and starred in Ted and A Million Ways to Die in the West. He also somehow found time to host the 85th Academy Awards in 2013. 

6. Jane Lynch // “Nurse”

The same year she appeared in the mockumentary Best in Show, Jane Lynch played an exasperated nurse who gets harassed by Emily when Richard is in the hospital in the season one episode “Forgiveness and Stuff.” Since then, she has starred in many films, including The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby, and A Mighty Wind. She has also had regular roles on shows Two and a Half Men, Party Down, and, of course, Glee. She currently hosts NBC’s Hollywood Game Night.

7. Masi Oka // “Unnamed philosophy student”

Masi Oka had just two roles under his belt when he played a student who gets into a debate with Rory when she sneaks into a Harvard class in the season two episode “The Road Trip to Harvard.” These days, Oka is best known for playing Hiro on four seasons of Heroes; he can now be seen as Dr. Max Bergman in Hawaii Five-0.

8. Brandon Routh // “Jess”

Future Superman Brandon Routh had appeared in a couple of TV shows—including MTV’s Undressed—before he played Jess, a handsome man who lured Madeline and Louise away from a Bangles concert, in the season one episode “Concert Interruptus.” Currently, he stars on the TV show Arrow.

9. Adam Brody // “Dave Rygalski”

Adam Brody had a number of roles before he landed the role of Seth Cohen in The O.C. One of them was Dave Rygalski on Gilmore Girls. The character, who appeared in season three, played in Lane’s band and eventually became her boyfriend; after Brody booked The O.C., characters on Gilmore Girls said that Dave “moved to California.”

10. Riki Lindhome // “Girl #2” And “Juliet”

These days, Riki Lindhome is best known as one half of the popular singing duo Garfunkel and Oates, which now has a TV show of the same name on IFC. But in the early days of her career, she booked a couple of roles on Gilmore Girls: In the season three episode “One’s Got Class and the Other One Dyes,” she plays a girl in a Stars Hollow classroom where Lorelai is giving a speech. In seasons five and six, Lindhome plays Juliet, a member of the Life and Death Brigade secret society along with Logan. Since Gilmore Girls, she has appeared in the movies My Best Friend’s Girl, The Last House on the Left, and Million Dollar Baby.

11. Abigail Spencer // “Megan”

Soap fans might have recognized Abigail Spencer—who played Rebecca Tyree on a season of All My Children—when she popped up on Gilmore Girls as Megan, one of the bridesmaids of Honor Huntzberger, Logan’s sister, in the season six episode “Bridesmaids Revisited.” Since the show, Spencer has had roles in Oz the Great and Powerful, This Means War, and Cowboys & Aliens. You can see her now playing Dana Scott on Suits.

12. Nasim Pedrad // “Waitress” 

Future SNL player Nasim Pedrad had just two credits to her name when she played a waitress in “Bridesmaids Revisited”; she waited on a sad, drunk Rory in a bar. After Gilmore Girls, she played a nurse on ER and landed SNL in 2009, where she stayed for five seasons. Most recently, she appeared in the sitcom Mulaney.

13. Matt Jones // “Morgan”

In his first TV role ever, Matt Jones helped Jackson deep fry a Thanksgiving turkey in the season two episode “A Deep Fried Korean Thanksgiving.” He didn’t get another TV role until 2008, when his career really took off: He played Badger on five seasons of Breaking Bad and now stars as Baxter in the CBS sitcom Mom.

14. Arielle Kebbel // “Lindsay”

Arielle Kebbel had done just a couple of bit parts on TV shows before she played Lindsay, who dates, then marries, Rory’s ex-boyfriend Dean in seasons four and five of Gilmore Girls. Since then, she’s starred in The Uninvited, John Tucker Must Die, and Think Like a Man. She frequently makes appearances as Lexi on The Vampire Diaries.

15. Ben Falcone // “Mr. Brink”

Ben Falcone played the executor of Fran’s will, who informs Lorelai that Fran’s family will be selling the Dragonfly Inn, in the season three episode “Say Goodnight, Gracie.” Before that, he had just four on-screen credits. Since Gilmore Girls, Falcone has been in Bridesmaids, Enough Said, and What to Expect When You’re Expecting. He also wrote and directed the 2014 film Tammy, which starred his wife, Melissa McCarthy, who played Sookie on Gilmore Girls.

16. Colin Egglesfield // “Sean” 

Colin Egglesfield had small parts on four TV shows—including Law & Order: SVU—before he played Sean in the season four episode “Girls in Bikinis, Boys Doin’ the Twist.” Rory meets Sean while she’s on spring break in Florida. She falls for him, but he doesn’t reciprocate much—until he sees her kiss Paris. Since Gilmore Girls, Egglesfield has been a cast member in many TV series, including All My Children, The Client List, and Rizzoli & Isles. He also played Dex, the romantic interest of both Ginnifer Goodwin and Kate Hudson, in the film Something Borrowed

17. Danny Pudi // “Raj”

Danny Pudi had appeared in one episode each of The West Wing and ER before playing Raj, a Yale Daily News writer, for four episodes in seasons six and seven of Gilmore Girls. Now, of course, he’s best known for playing Abed Nadir in Community.

18. Victoria Justice // “Jill #2”

In her first television appearance ever, Victoria Justice played Jill #2, a young girl at a party catered by Lorelai and Sookie, in the season four episode “The Hobbit, the Sofa, and Digger Stiles.” She claimed that Sookie’s cooking “tastes like diapers.” Since Gilmore Girls, Justice has starred in two wildly popular Nickelodeon shows: Zoey 101 and Victorious. She can now be seen in the new MTV series Eye Candy, where she plays a cyber sleuth. 

19. Emily Bergl // “Francie Jarvis”

Emily Bergl had a few small roles before she played Rory’s intimidating, popular classmate at Chilton in the second and third seasons of Gilmore Girls. Since then, Bergl has appeared on Desperate Housewives and was a regular on Southland until 2013. She now stars as Sammi in Shameless.

20. KRYSTEN RITTER // “LUCY”

Fresh off her gig as Gia Goodman in Veronica Mars—but a few years before she played Jane Margolis, Jesse Pinkman’s girlfriend, on Breaking Bad, or the titular superhero in Jessica Jones—Krysten Ritter played Lucy, one of Rory’s college friends at Yale, in several episodes of the show’s seventh (and final) season.

An earlier version of this post ran in 2015.


November 24, 2016 – 12:00pm