Research shows that parents who want their children to cut back on screen-time must cut back on screen-time themselves.
This Is Why Your Phone Struggles for Service on Airport Tarmacs
One thing is certain when you’re on the tarmac: your cell phone service sucks. Unfortunately for passengers sending a “taking off” or “just landed” text from the airport tarmac, the message never seems to reach its destination in a timely fashion.
From a logical perspective, perhaps being trapped inside a sealed metal plane explains why your cell phone struggles for service worse than me trying to make a decision at the buffet. It turns out you can blame the structural design of both airports and planes for the terribly slow service on the tarmac.
Is everyone’s phone connection horrifically bad when your plane sits on the tarmac, or is it just me?
Everyone seems to look at their phone immediately after landing, and I can’t figure out if they’re happily online or they keep trying to refresh like me
— Greg (@biggiant001) April 4, 2019
Christopher Schaberg, a writer for The Atlantic, spoke to three commercial pilots who fly for major airlines like Delta and British Airways in order to discover the secret behind the slow cell service on airport tarmacs. The professor at Loyola University of New Orleans discovered that cellular antennae often do not provide sufficient coverage to span the entire distance of an airport, including the tarmac.
Airports utilize distributed antenna systems that work best indoors. Unfortunately for travelers (and even pilots), those antennae really only work inside the terminal. That lack of capacity combined with the plane’s materials—which are obviously designed for structural integrity rather than connectivity—means that anyone sitting in the tarmac has a better chance of winning the lottery than refreshing their Instagram feed in a timely fashion.
Me after 10+ hours on a @Fly_Norwegian plane with no WiFi and blocked cell service on the long tarmac wait at JFK. pic.twitter.com/SoS1J5q706
— Stina Sternberg (@StinaSternberg) May 13, 2019
And if your flight gets delayed, the connection conundrum only gets worse.
To avoid the painful boredom of sitting in the cabin with nothing to do, try downloading some content before boarding your flight. Having a few episodes of your favorite show stored in your downloads will come in handy to pass the time, especially if weather or technical issues cause a delay.
Believe me, bing-watching a few episodes of Breaking Bad is far better than thumbing through the safety evacuation manual.
The post This Is Why Your Phone Struggles for Service on Airport Tarmacs appeared first on UberFacts.
These Jobs Probably Won’t Exist in 20 Years
The world is changing very rapidly. There are countless jobs out there that weren’t even on people’s radars 20 years ago, but what jobs today might be obsolete themselves 20 years in the future?
These 15 Redditors have some ideas!
15. What’s that job called again?
Hopefully, that job where that dude stands in the men’s room of a bar and squirts soap into your hands, and hands you a paper towel, expecting a tip. I don’t hate the guy who does that job, but I loathe the fact that that job exists and that I’m forced to choose between wasting money, looking like a jerk and stiffing the guy, or taking the loophole and not washing my hands.
14. Except for Family Video…
Video store employees.
13. Never mind the papers themselves.
It’s me again, just lonely here, thinking bout the paperboy, wondering when he’s gonna bring me some good news
12. What about Facebook, though?
Any job related to Facebook.
11. Selling things over the phone at all?
My current job may not exist in 5 years, so I am not sure that counts.
I sell reference titles over the phone, specifically print reference titles. I suspect that with the current flow of technology this company may only be around for another 3 – 5 years.
10. The sticker-slapper.
Ever watch “How’s Its Made” and there’s this complicated ass machine literally piecing together and building some kind of complicated product. There are arms grabbing, and lasers cutting, belts moving things, and just miracle after miracle of modern automation. Then there’s this dude who moves the finished product into a box and slaps a label on. And the viewer wonders why the fuck did they need a person to do that lousy step? That job doesn’t stand a chance.
9. They even charge you to do it yourself, so.
That asshole you have to wait a week for from the cable company just to plug in a box for an exorbitant fee.
Edit: everyone… tell me how much this bums you out…
rubs nipples
8. Pretty sure this is already happening.
BlackBerry tech support.
7. I like your hope and optimism.
I hope jobs in general won’t exist in 10-20 years. Wall-E.
Edit: Oh my…what have I started.
6. No one to kill you (at least on the ride home).
Taxi Drivers. Hopefully in 20 years autonomous cars will mean we can go to the pub, get drunk and drive home safely. The computerised cars might have to be programmed to understand slurred words and mistyped commands though!
5. At least you’re aware.
Mine. I am a switchboard operator, a dying breed.
4. They’re already down to like, 1 real person an exit.
Toll Collectors.
3. Do you want to trust a remote control with your life, though?
Train Engineers. My father is one and complains about the newer remote controlled trains taking jobs every day.
2. As we know them, anyway.
Weed dealers will become obsolete quite soon.
EDIT: Weed dealers as we currently know them will be obsolete. They’ll be forever more convenient and less sketchy.
1. Fingers crossed for this one to miss the list.
I’m really sad to say this – but I hope that libraries are still operational in 10-20 years. Maybe bookstores too.
I think that while everybody says, ‘no way, books will be around forever, blablabla’ there is also the fact that libraries run on public funding and there has been legislation that continuously cuts hours and shuts down libraries.
Do you have anything to add? Agree? Disagree?
Tell us what you think in the comments!
The post These Jobs Probably Won’t Exist in 20 Years appeared first on UberFacts.
A Terminally Ill Scientist Wants to Turn Himself Into a Cyborg Before He Passes Away
We sometimes joke from time to time about robot uprisings, the day when technology becomes too much for humanity to handle, or how we might be able to use it to be able to “live” forever. There have been countless television and movies that have explored those ideas (and associated fears) over the years – but now one scientist thinks he could actually live forever via tech.
Or at least become part robot.
Dr. Peter Bowman Scott-Morgan is a roboticist who has been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It’s a degenerative condition, also known as Lou Gehrig’s. It has few treatment options and no cure, so Scott-Morgan decided to work toward becoming the “world’s first full cyborg.”
Image Credit: Twitter
After undergoing four medical procedures in an attempt to prolong and improve the quality of his life, he refers to himself as Peter 2.0.
Peter has a feeding tube that goes directly into his stomach, a catheter that goes directly into his bladder, a colostomy bag into his colon, and he also underwent a laryngectomy to remove is larynx, which connects his mouth and nose to his lungs.
He’s not able to speak with a natural voice and can breathe only with a respirator, but it also takes away the risk of saliva accumulating into his lungs, which would basically cause him to drown.
He tweeted after coming home from the hospital the last time.
Just home from 24 days in Intensive Care. All medical procedures now complete and a huge success. My mini-ventilator keeping me breathing is a LOT quieter than Darth Vader’s. All speech is synthetic but at last sounds like me again. Long research road ahead but in great spirits. pic.twitter.com/JPjwjagDLT
— Dr Peter B Scott-Morgan (@DrScottMorgan) November 11, 2019
“Just home from 24 days in Intensive Care. All medical procedures now complete and a huge success. My mini-ventilator keeping me breathing is a LOT quieter than Darth Vader’s. All speech is synthetic but at last sounds like me again. Long research road ahead but in great spirits.”
Scott-Morgan writes on his website that he’s working on the “experiment of this life,” and plans to use his robotics knowledge to not only survive, but to thrive with a disease that spells the end for everyone who gets handed the diagnosis – over 220,000 people around the world.
NOW REPLUMBED AS A CYBORG four tubes will keep me alive long after I become fully paralysed (apart from my eyes, which will still move). My body’s sole function will then be to sustain my brain. This first transition has not been so much based on Medical Science as Engineering. pic.twitter.com/AqkeMwnQ4I
— Dr Peter B Scott-Morgan (@DrScottMorgan) November 13, 2019
In addition to the surgeries, he’s made big upgrades to his wheelchair that make it easier to move around his home, and will undergo laser eye surgery so that he can better read and control the computer screen using only his eyes – because in time, he won’t be able to control any of the other muscles in his body.
You can catch a documentary detailing his journey into becoming Peter 2.0 in 2020.
And for now, Peter is living happily in Devonshire with his husband, Francis.
The post A Terminally Ill Scientist Wants to Turn Himself Into a Cyborg Before He Passes Away appeared first on UberFacts.
An 8-Year-Old Boy With a Multi-Million Dollar Income Was Named the Highest-Earning YouTuber of 2019
Well, this is depressing…
How much money did you make in 2019? This 8-year-old kid on YouTube probably out-earned you.
In fact, he out-earned almost everyone.
Ryan Kaji earned a stunning $26 million on YouTube in 2019, making him the highest-earning YouTuber in the world. Ryan started his channel, Ryan’s World (formerly Ryan ToysReview), when he was just 3 years old. It consists of toy reviews, science experiments, educational videos, playing games, and more.
This is the second year in a row that Ryan has been the highest-earning YouTuber, beating other popular YouTube celebrities like PewDiePie and Jeffree Star. His income last year was $22 million.
Ryan’s YouTube fame has also evolved into other, more traditional show business deals, like a preschool-aimed series on Nickelodeon and a deal with Hulu.
8 year-old Ryan Kaji is YouTube’s highest-paid creator for 2019, earning $26 million. His channel (Ryan’s World, 23 million subscribers) consists of toy reviews, science experiments and educational videos for children. Ryan also has a show on Nickelodeon and a deal with Hulu. pic.twitter.com/cFG7QPZXAx
— Yoni (@OriginalYoni) December 19, 2019
Unsurprisingly, Ryan’s impressive year is causing a lot of jealousy on social media.
“I hate my life,” one person wrote.
“I need a YouTube channel,” another said.
“I might fuck around and start reviewing toys,” another joked.
Life isn’t quite that simple for this 8-year-old millionaire, though. Earlier this year, Ryan’s channel was the subject of a complaint filed to the Federal Trade Commission. A nonprofit called Truth In Advertising (TINA) claimed that the channel “deceptively promotes a multitude of products to millions of preschool-aged children in violation of FTC law.”
“When a YouTube video directed to children under the age of 5 mixes advertising with program content, as Ryan ToysReview videos frequently do, the preschool audience is unable to understand or even identify the difference between marketing material and organic content, even when there is a verbal indicator that attempts to identify the marketing content,” TINA Executive Director Bonnie Patten and Legal Director Laura Smith wrote in their complaint.
Ryan’s dad says their family strictly adheres to YouTube’s terms of service and cares about their viewers’ safety.
Something else to consider: Ryan is eight. So does he understand?
Who knows?
The post An 8-Year-Old Boy With a Multi-Million Dollar Income Was Named the Highest-Earning YouTuber of 2019 appeared first on UberFacts.
Stars Are Disappearing and Scientists Aren’t Ruling out Aliens as a Cause
There have been a few stories lately when scientists and other suit-and-tie types have been unwilling to say aliens aren’t behind one thing or another – which I guess is the safest course, because no one likes to be proven wrong.
I mean, if a situation actually arose in which aliens were discovered, I doubt people would be running around pointing fingers at all of the folks who said aliens were a fantasy. But what do I know.
…But back to the story at hand, and the hundred-plus stars that have disappeared from the map.
. . . #岡山県 #井原市 #美星町 #美星天文台 #岡山へ行こう #星活 #星空撮影 #星景ら部 #天の川 #milkyway #nightphotography #nightsky #night_gram #night_shots #japan_night_view #best_moments_night #stars #setouchigram92 #colore_de_saison #瀬戸内カメラ部 #star_hunter_jp #team_jp_西 #Lovers_Nippon #photo_shorttrip #eosm3 #サムヤン12mmf2 #キリトリセカイ #その瞬間に物語を #ダレカニミセタイソラYes, it turns out that the night sky, which has remained static enough to guide seamen and pirates and explorers for eons, is changing.
The Vanishing and Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations Project (VASCO) compares 70-year-old surveys with recent images of the night sky to document what has changed, and after years of painstaking work (there are a lot of stars, after all), they’ve published their results in the Astronomical Journal.
The 100-odd stars that were documented to have disappeared could represent short-lived flashes in the night, or they could be actual stars that disappeared.
The researchers hope their results, and results to come, will be relevant to astronomy and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI).
“VASCO is a project that is both a SETI project and a conventional astrophysics project,” explained Beatriz Villarroel, a researcher at the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics and one of the report’s coauthor. “Even if we do SETI and have SETI questions, we are also interested in publishing other results that we find along the way.”
The disappeared pinpricks of light are curious because when stars die, their last burst of glory is usually hard to miss – people saw and wrote about them long before there were telescopes – so if they can also just wink out without fanfare, well, we want to know why.
And to that end, some of the researchers don’t think we should rule out something like another advanced civilization blocking stars with their solar panels to gather energy.
For her part, Villarroel is on board.
“If we should look for aliens, maybe we should actually look for something that would be truly absurd to find.”
#NightSky #StarrySky #stargazing #space #astronomy #astropics #MyHappyPlace #UnderAStarrySky #pics #photography #NightPics #WV #WVstargazing #SkyGazing #TheSkyThe research is being conducted by a team of 20 astronomers and astrophysicists who have compared 70 years worth of sky images taken by the US Naval Observatory and the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System.
They used software to analyze 600 million light sources that should have appeared in the earliest and most recent sets of data. At first, the number of potential missing stars numbered around 150,000, but was winnowed down to 24,000 after some additional cross-referencing.
In the end, Villarroel is confident the 100 stars they presented are, indeed, missing.
“We have done the best work to remove anything that resembles any artifacts.”
If they are – or were – brief flashes that just happened to show up on the old US Navy surveys, they were likely red dwarf flares, variable stars that dimmed, or the afterglow of a gamma ray burst.
If they really were enduring light sources that disappeared without fanfare, Villarroel – and others – would be much more excited. SETI enthusiasts have speculated about how alien civilizations with advanced engineering power could shield a star from view.”You would have to exclude all-natural things, and then there might also be new natural phenomena that we don’t know about can be more exciting.”
If this is totally blowing your skirt up, the scientists at VASCO plan to implement a citizen science project that lets civilians help search through the rest of the 150,000 candidates.
You know you want to be the one who discovers the spot where technologically advanced aliens are hiding….
The post Stars Are Disappearing and Scientists Aren’t Ruling out Aliens as a Cause appeared first on UberFacts.
You Might Need This ‘Nap Desk’ in Your Life If You Want to Be More Productive
George Constanza was right…about napping during working hours, that is.
I don’t know about you, but I tend to hit the wall in the middle of the workday. I have a TON of energy from about 8 A.M. to about 2 P.M. and then…uh oh…this guy gets a little sleepy, and it’s time for a 30-minute snoozer. Well, it turns out I’m not alone, and maybe I shouldn’t even feel guilty about that mid-day nap!
That’s why you might want to consider picking up this nap desk that allows you to slumber peacefully below your desk so you don’t have to go far to get those ZZZZZZZs in.
The desk comes to us from folks at the architecture and design firm Studio NL in Greece, and it is pretty impressive. The sleeping quarters are snuggled conveniently underneath the desk where a worker slaves away, so you’d be able to just kick off your shoes, put on your sleeping mask, and start counting sheep.
Although we have a hard-working attitude here in the U.S. for which downtime is frowned upon by many, relaxing and refueling are very important to well-being.
But if you’re one of the naysayers who think that napping is bad or counterproductive, many studies have shown that naps can actually make you more productive: they can “increase alertness in the period directly following the nap and may extend alertness a few hours later in the day.”
Sign me up! I’m ready for this! How about you?
The post You Might Need This ‘Nap Desk’ in Your Life If You Want to Be More Productive appeared first on UberFacts.
Samuel L. Jackson’s Voice Has Arrived on Alexa. With Profanity and All…
I live in an Alexa household, even though we’re well aware we’ve invited the government and big business and probably more eyes and ears into our homes. It just makes it so easy to add things to the grocery list, turn the lights off and on (because who wants to stand up?), play music, and on and on.
Even so, I’ll be the first person to say that Alexa’s voice can quickly go from pleasant to annoying, depending on one’s mood.
Do you know whose melodious voice is always welcome, though?
My mother pays $0.99 a month for her Alexa to be Samuel L Jackson and honestly… I get it pic.twitter.com/6PSxB9bx7s
— GARY, NO FIRES IN THE HOUSE (@literallyfallon) December 14, 2019
One Samuel L. Jackson.
And now, he can be the voice turning your lights on and adding stuff to your shopping list.
The Guardian is reporting that Amazon has confirmed they will be using neural text-to-speech technology to mimic Jackson’s voice, so it won’t just be pre-recorded phrases – Jackson can do anything from read you the weather to sing you Happy Birthday.
Me and my 9 year old: *giggling e endlessly as we buy a Samuel L Jackson voice mod for Alexa*
My wife: "what the fuck is wrong with you" pic.twitter.com/M94kh81a16
— Lucipherion (@lucipherion) December 17, 2019
He won’t be able to help with your shopping, reminders, lists, or other Alexa Skills. Womp-womp.
This is all with Samuel L. Jackson’s approval, of course, and you’re certainly aware that the award-winning actor is as famous for his blue language as his performance skills – which is why Alexa is going to allow you to set your device to allow him to swear appropriately in his responses.
Which you know, is just a win for everyone involved, really.
Its time.
You can turn Alexa, into Samuel L. Jackson for $0.99https://t.co/mz73Q0gzcg pic.twitter.com/bmNOOIfcSE
— Fat Kid Deals (@FatKidDeals) December 12, 2019
You’ll be able to download the technology for just $.99 to start, but if you want to keep it forever, eventually you’ll have to pay $4.99.
If you’re someone like my sister, who gets prissy about profanity, don’t worry – Amazon promises that deals with other celebrities are in the works, and before long “Alexa” could be just about anyone you like.
Which is a little terrifying.
The post Samuel L. Jackson’s Voice Has Arrived on Alexa. With Profanity and All… appeared first on UberFacts.
This Is Why Dice Are a Lot Better Than Computers at Generating Truly Random Numbers
We have a lot of ways to do things at random: roll a die, flip a coin, pick a number – but one thing that actually doesn’t work so well: computers. Computers struggle to truly be random, even when they’re programmed to do exactly that.
You’ve probably noticed that even if you have thousands of songs on your phone, your shuffle function will “randomly” choose some songs more often than others.
hackster.io/lagsilva #hackster #arduino #numbergenerator #randomnumbergenerator #randomnumbers #ledmatrixThe reason? Your computer follows an algorithm, which is essentially a list of instructions they use to carry out a task. They don’t know how to deviate from the set path (when they figure that out, the robot revolution will be upon us).
So, while engineers have come up with some ways to write algorithms that help computers pretend to generate random numbers, when it comes down to it, they really can’t be truly random because they are following instructions that lead them to their outcome.
The best we can do is a pseudo-random number generator, which honestly, is good enough to fool anyone who isn’t a computer programmer. But if you had the coding skills, you could, say, figure out the randomness behind an online poker program and make some serious cash.
True random number generators use physical phenomena akin to rolling a die – things like radioactive decay, background noise, or even the amount of time between your keystrokes. But again, we can’t even really call them truly random, since they’re still following an algorithm that has the physical phenomenon at its root.
: Takže, generátor randomných čísel mi vybral 5 čísel aby som z nich vytvorila nejaké líčenie! Potiahnite doľava pre výsledok! 
Čo si myslíte? . . 
: So random number generator picked me 5 random numbers to create some makeup look from it! Swipe to the left to see results! 
PRODUCTS: @nyxcosmetics_czsk Honey dew me up primer @makeuprevolutionczsk Conceal & Define full coverage foundation – F1 @makeuprevolutionczsk Conceal & Define full coverage conceal and contour @catrice.cosmetics Nude illusion loose powder @makeuprevolutionczsk Hyaluronic fix hydrating & plumping makeup fixing spray @morphebrushes Palette by @jamescharles @makeuprevolution Roxi contour and highlight palette @makeuprevolution Brow pomade – medium brown @makeuprevolution Soph x highlighter palette by @soph @catrice.cosmetics Calligraph pro precise matt liner waterproof @misssporty Studio lash 3D volumythic mascara @dermacol_cz_sk Matte Mania liquid lip colour 15 Lashes from aliexpress . . . #nyxcosmetics #nyx #makeuprevolution #revolution #revolutionbrows #morphe #morphebrushes #morphebabe #catrice #catricecosmetics #catricemakeup #misssporty #misssportyczsk #dermacol #dermacoloriginal #dermacol_cz_sk #dermacolmattemania #jamescharles #soph #roxxsaurus #makeup #makeupartist #makeuptutorial #makeuplover #randomnumbergenerator #randommakeup #makeuplookWhich means I’m going to just keep rolling a dice for my numbers.
Not that I often need truly random numbers anyway…
The post This Is Why Dice Are a Lot Better Than Computers at Generating Truly Random Numbers appeared first on UberFacts.
These Are the 20 Worst Passwords You Can Choose
You’ve probably realized that having strong passwords is one of the best things you can do to protect your identity, your money, and your privacy in general (if you have trouble remembering a lot of different passwords, get a password manager).
Or at least, I hope you have – because there are still a disturbing number of people using “password” as their password like, everywhere.
Yeah, even at their banks and stuff.
Along with that one, here are 20 of the easiest-to-guess, least secure passwords you could choose.
So…don’t.
20. welcome
Yes, welcome to my credit card.
19. 7777777
Random number, they’ll never guess seven!
18. lovely
This is just random.
17. 555555
Another number over and over, yes, secure.
16. 654321
Oooh backwards counting!
15. qwertyuiop
This made me giggle.
14. admin
Talk about phoning it in.
13. 1q2w3e4r
I mean, at least you pretended to try.
12. qwerty123
They’ll never try a combination!
11. abc123
Aw, look at you being all tricksy like.
10. 123123
Who do you think you’re kidding?
9. 111111
They’ll never guess this one!!
8. iloveyou
That’s sweet. Let me take all of your money.
7. 12345
Isn’t 6 characters like some kind of minimum?
6. 12345678
You guys, please stop.
5. 1234567
No seriously, stop.
4. password
Yep, still on the list. I told you.
3. qwerty
This one makes me laugh. People are dumb.
2. 123456789
At least it’s long?
1. 123456
Yes, really.
I’m guilty of using variations of the same passwords for years on end, but none nearly as bad as these! Yeesh!
Are you guilty? Go ahead and out yourself in the comments!
The post These Are the 20 Worst Passwords You Can Choose appeared first on UberFacts.