20 Eerie Images of an Abandoned Shopping Mall

Weeks ahead of its scheduled demolition, photographer Seph Lawless got a last look at what has become of Kansas City’s Metro North Mall in the two years since its closure.


Jennifer M Wood


Thursday, November 24, 2016 – 18:00

Rich Title: 
20 Eerie Images of an Abandoned Shopping Mall
Article Icon: 
Schedule Publish: 
Content not scheduled for publishing.
Exclude Slideshow Mode: 
Infographic: 
Universal Credit: 
All images courtesy of Seph Lawless
Exclude from mobile site: 
0
Intro Text: 

An empty shopping mall isn’t something you see too often at this time of year, but photographer Seph Lawless isn’t interested in easily observed sights. Over the years, we’ve shared many of his haunting photo series of abandoned places—including homes, amusement parks, a Disney water park, and, yes, shopping malls. It’s that Orange Julius-happy staple of 20th-century consumerism that has fueled Lawless’s latest project: A new photo book, Autopsy of America: The Death of a Nation, that’s slated for an April 2017 release, but is currently available for pre-order on Amazon.

Lawless shared some images from Kansas City’s Metro North Mall. According to The Pitch, the shopping mall, which is scheduled to be demolished in a few weeks, “was a rockin’ spot in the 1980s. It closed in 2014, and the property will be redeveloped soon, possibly with a Trader Joe’s in the mix.” But Lawless describes it as “by far the creepiest mall I’ve been in.” See for yourself in the photo gallery below.

More of Lawless’s work can be viewed on his Website, or by following him on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

The Time an Engineer Accidentally Started the Space Race and Changed the Course of History

filed under: books, History, space
Image credit: 
Amazon/iStock

We tend to look back on the white-hot 12 years between Sputnik I and Neil Armstrong and say, “Well of course the United States won the Space Race,” but the fog of history obscures the uncertainties of how it would all end. For much of the Space Race, not only was the Soviet Union ahead, but ahead by giant leaps. This is because of a brilliant, mysterious Soviet engineer whose public identity was simply “the Chief Designer.” Revealed only after his death to be a rocket scientist named Sergei Korolev, not only did he fly circles—literally—around the American space program, but he has the distinction of having tricked the Soviet leadership into kicking off what would eventually become the space race. Here is how he did it, as described by Matthew Brzezinski in his magnificent book Red Moon Rising: Sputnik and the Hidden Rivalries That Ignited the Space Age.

A CHEAPER WAY OF WAR

The Soviet Union was, in short, broke, which made difficult its bitter Cold War with the United States. The Soviets simply lacked the funds to maintain the kind of massive standing army necessary to go to war with the Americans at a moment’s notice. Their detonation of the atomic bomb leveled the playing field a bit, but the Americans had overwhelming air superiority that included massive B-47 bombers flying every minute. The sheer brazenness of American bomber deployment and the scope of their exercises made Soviet leadership fear that the Americans might actually be serious about war.

After the defeat of Germany in World War II, the world’s powers pillaged German scientific and engineering files, prying open “high-quality steel laboratory doors” and literally stepping over the bodies of dead Germans to seize schematics, mockups, and prototypes of the most advanced rocketry program in the world. The Soviets took what they found (far less than the Americans had managed to secure) and made rapid strides, first matching the stolen German rockets and slowly surpassing them. The Chief Designer’s first real breakthrough—the R-5 rocket—was one ton lighter than those of the Germans and capable of holding 60 percent more fuel while producing 60 percent more thrust. The rocket had a range of 800 miles and could hold a warhead six times that of the Hiroshima bomb. As one might imagine, this greatly interested the leadership of the Soviet Union.

When Korolev personally unveiled his rocket to members of the Soviet Presidium, he had two goals, one secret and one obvious. He very overtly wanted them to believe in rockets as a method of waging war, and the presidium was onboard almost without reservation. Marveling at the R-5, it seemed incomprehensible to them that “such a strange, fragile object could wield such power; that with one push of a button it could vaporize an entire city in an instant.” Missile warfare meant that “you didn’t need planes, tanks, or troops, or an invasion fleet”; all of Europe (but for Spain and Portugal) was within its range, and five missiles could “destroy all of England.”

The Chief Designer’s missile immediately countered the American tactical advantage in the air—and did so for bargain bin prices. And that wasn’t even the best of it. The Chief Designer had a new rocket in development called the R-7: the world’s first intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of achieving 450 tons of thrust. (The German rockets taken after the war had a mere 27.) The Soviet officials—Premier Nikita Khrushchev among them—were awestruck.

This is when the Chief Designer made his move to set his secret plan into motion. He brought the men into an adjacent room and unveiled a strange model on a table—something called a “satellite.” He launched into an impassioned speech about humanity’s quest to escape the bonds of Earth, and that with a few modifications, the R-7 could actually help achieve this dream. The Soviet leadership was unimpressed. Who cared? They wanted to bring thermonuclear devastation to Washington.

Faced with this brick wall, the Chief Designer lied. The Americans, he said, were on the verge of launching one of their very own, and how great would it be to demonstrate superior Soviet scientific strength than by beating the Americans to the punch? All it would take was launching an R-7 missile with the satellite on board instead of a warhead, he explained. Again, the bait was not taken. So he again lied—or at least, exaggerated greatly—adding that the satellite would in no way interfere with the development of the missile.

Korolev, the Chief Designer, had long dreamed of launching an “artificial moon,” but had been struck down every step of the way. The problem was the Soviet bureaucracy. At every level, someone could say no to what amounted to a silly, purposeless hurling of metal into space—and at every level, they did. But now, with Khrushchev in the room, he could neutralize and bypass the entire bureaucracy.

“If the main task doesn’t suffer, do it,” said the Soviet premier.

THE MAIN TASK, SUFFERING

The Chief Designer now had to deliver. Khrushchev believed all of Korolev’s promises, and began slashing the expensive Soviet military, which would no longer be needed in this age of missile warfare. What the Chief Designer had failed to mention was that the R-7 was nowhere near ready to launch. It had serious stabilization problems, thermal problems, friction problems, fuel problems—even launch pad problems (specifically: no launch pad existed that could handle such a massive missile). Worse yet, its nose cone was incapable of surviving reentry, which rendered it worthless as a weapon. (The warhead would be destroyed on reentry.)

The first R-7 missile finally launched in 1957. It flew for less than two minutes and crashed. Though pressure was building, the Chief Designer was optimistic. First launches always failed, he knew. But the following month, the second launch failed, too. This time, it didn’t launch at all, simply coughing a lot of smoke and falling silent. The launch one month later did take flight—for 33 seconds—before disintegrating.

Only three things saved Korolev from a terrible fate. First, the American rocket program was mired in the sort of bureaucratic infighting that the Chief Designer had managed to avoid. Specifically, the U.S. Army and Air Force had competing missile programs, and undercut each other at every turn, with Congress and the Defense Department each doing their parts to make things more difficult for missile designers. American officials, meanwhile, dismissed rumors of a Soviet manmade moon, and felt no pressure to launch one of their own. As Brzezinski notes in his book, “Russia couldn’t possibly smuggle a suitcase bomb into the United States, went one popular punchline, because the Soviets hadn’t yet perfected the suitcase.” Spaceships were simply laughably beyond Soviet reach. Second, the catastrophic Budapest Uprising distracted the Soviet leadership from paying much attention to the early R-7 failures. Third was an attempted coup d’état against Khrushchev. Settling scores in the aftermath preoccupied his time, leaving the latest R-7 disaster almost unnoticed.

SEEN AND HEARD

The fourth launch of the R-7 was a success, with a caveat: The thermal protection on its nose cone failed, destroying the dummy warhead on reentry. Still, that could be corrected, and anyway, it had no effect on the Chief Designer’s real purpose: the satellite, which wouldn’t have to survive reentry, as it would be fired into orbit. At last in possession of a rocket that worked, Korolev was ready to launch his satellite—only to be rejected by the state commission overseeing the R-7 program.

Their reasons were myriad. Unlike Khrushchev, the commissioners knew specifically that the satellite would delay the “main task” of getting a thermonuclear bomb over Washington, D.C. Worse, rockets weren’t cheap, and there weren’t enough supplies to waste an R-7 on the distracting toy of a petulant engineer. Moreover, until the R-7 nose cone was perfected, the nuclear armaments chief couldn’t test a live warhead, which meant his own progress was being held up. The ground control officers didn’t want to reorient their monitoring stations; their hardware was designed for weapons of war and very specific trajectories—not “satellites” and orbits.

Trajectories especially mattered because Korolev wanted his satellite seen, and this would require careful calculations using the Soviet Union’s most powerful computer. He wanted it visible in the night sky over the United States. It’s why he chose the construction material (“highly reflective aluminum … polished to a mirrorlike sheen”) and its shape (spherical, so that it would catch the light better). He wanted no doubt that he had done it—that he had placed an object in space and that it was actually orbiting the Earth. It had to be seen. And when it wasn’t seen, he wanted it heard. This, too, annoyed Soviet officials—this time in academia. The satellite’s payload would not be scientific, but rather, redundant radio transmitters that sent out little pulses. “Hearing,” writes Brzezinski, “was also believing.”

Korolev had no way of mollifying the Soviet bureaucracy. The nose cone problem could take months if not years to solve, leaving Korolev dead in the water, yet so close to his true goal.

MUSIC NO ONE HAS EVER HEARD BEFORE

Just when hope seemed lost, a second consecutive and largely perfect R-7 test went off, and Korolev again had the attention of Khrushchev. Though the nose cone melted as usual, that the rocket could be said to launch reliably was vindication for Khrushchev, who had bet his nation’s security on rocketry and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The Chief Designer was more Khrushchev’s man than ever, and whatever the Chief Designer wanted, the Chief Designer would get. Immediately, opposition to the satellite launch scurried in opposite directions, with officials worried suddenly that: 1. The United States might launch a satellite first, and 2. Khrushchev would then demand to know who interfered with the Chief Designer’s efforts to get there first.

“Simple Satellite 1″—or Sputnik, as it was called—launched on October 4, 1957. When its tracking signal was received at the mission’s control room, cheers erupted, though there was hesitation: it still had to orbit the planet. It would take an hour and a half before the signal resumed, the Earth having now been circled. They had done it. “This is music no one has ever heard before,” Korolev said at the time.

Few at the time understood the significance of Sputnik. It’s possible Eisenhower wasn’t even briefed on it the night it made its first orbit. The official White House response thereafter incorrectly credited German rocket engines for the achievement, and dismissed the very utility of a satellite, noting that its “value … to mankind will for a long time be highly problematical.” The secretary of defense called it “a silly bauble.” A commander of the American rocket program called it a “hunk of iron that almost anyone could launch.” (In fact, it would take almost five months and multiple public failures by the American space program before they could repeat Sputnik’s success.)

Whatever American officials said publicly, Sputnik’s signal simply could not be downplayed or ignored. The beeps were broadcast on NBC, the evening anchor saying, “Listen now for the sound that will forever more separate the old from the new.” Ham radio enthusiasts monitored it. Amateur astronomers every evening attempted to find and follow glints of light on the first artificial moon to cross the night sky. Neither the United States nor the Soviet Union intended to enter a space race—it all started because one man was obsessed with getting there first. Nobody predicted that the event would eventually transform political priorities in the United States, and as Red Moon Rising details, would dominate global affairs for the next 20 years.


November 24, 2016 – 2:00pm

The Silver Swan Automaton Will Visit London’s Science Museum Next Year

filed under: museums, robots, travel
Image credit: 

By Andrew Curtis, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

After nearly 150 years of staying put at England’s Bowes Museum, the Silver Swan—a one-of-a-kind, life-sized swan automaton and music box—is about to take flight. Created in 1773 by Belgian inventor John Joseph Merlin along with British jeweler James Cox, the mechanism will be on display as part of “Robots,” a new exhibition that’s opening at London’s Science Museum in February, according to Cult of Weird.

The Silver Swan is widely known for its precision craftsmanship, detailed silverwork, and advancements in clockwork gears. When it’s wound up, the music box plays and the river the swan floats on—composed of rotating glass cylinders—begins to stream. The automaton then begins to preen itself, as it moves its head from side to side. The swan later dips its head down to catch and eat one of the small silver fish swimming below. It finally lifts its head again, a fish wriggling in its mouth, as the performance ends after 32 seconds of elegant “dancing.” A waterfall was believed to be positioned behind the Silver Swan at one time, but it was stolen during years of touring.

The automaton gained mass popularity when it was put on display at the International Exposition of 1867 in Paris, France. Mark Twain actually saw the swan in person at that event, the second world’s fair, and wrote about the oddity in The Innocents Abroad. According to Twain, the swan “had a living grace about his movement and a living intelligence in his eyes.”

“We are thrilled that the Silver Swan—one of the greatest 18th-century automatons—will be part of our ‘Robots’ exhibition,” Ben Russell, the Science Museum’s lead curator, said. “The Swan is an amazing evocation of life, and makes us reflect on our endless fascination with replicating living things in mechanical form.”

The Silver Swan will make its way to the Science Museum from February 8 to March 23, 2017.

[h/t Cult of Weird]


November 24, 2016 – 4:00am

The ‘Resident Evil 7’ Collector’s Edition Comes With a Tiny Haunted House

Image credit: 

For the past 20 years, the Resident Evil franchise has been the leader of horror video games with its creepy design, monstrous creatures, and more than two dozen titles in its library. However, the upcoming Resident Evil 7: Biohazard has outdone itself with a special collector’s edition release, which comes with a detailed 8-inch model of the Baker plantation mansion from the video game, Engadget reports.

The limited edition haunted house replica comes with flashing LED lights and speakers, as it doubles as a spooky music box. It plays a sample of “Go Tell Aunt Rhody,” the main theme from Resident Evil 7. The collector’s edition—which is exclusive to GameStop—also comes with an old VHS tape box, a metal case, a severed bloody finger that doubles as a 4GB USB stick, a lithograph of the Baker family, and a mysterious creepy note that reads, “I shall dash you against the stones,” which is a verse from the Bible.

The Resident Evil 7: Biohazard collector’s edition, which will be released on January 24, 2017, will retail for $179.99 and will be available for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One. The video game is also available on PC, but not the special collector’s edition with all the extra goodies.

[h/t Engadget]


November 24, 2016 – 2:00am

20 Vintage Photos of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade

A look back at 90 years of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.


Jennifer M Wood


Wednesday, November 23, 2016 – 12:00

Rich Title: 
20 Vintage Photos of the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade
Article Icon: 
Schedule Publish: 
Content not scheduled for publishing.
Exclude Slideshow Mode: 
Infographic: 
Exclude from mobile site: 
0
Intro Text: 
This year marks the 90th annual Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. To celebrate a near-century of the beloved Turkey Day tradition, we’re looking back at parades past.

10 Filling Facts About Turkeys

Image credit: 
iStock

Don’t be fooled by their reputation for being thoughtless. These roly-poly birds have a few tricks up their wings.

1. THE BIRDS WERE NAMED AFTER THE COUNTRY.

The turkey is an American bird, so why does it share its name with a country on the other side of the world? Laziness, mostly. Turkish traders had been importing African guinea fowl to Europe for some time when North American explorers started shipping M. gallopavo back to the Old World. The American birds looked kind of like the African “turkey-cocks,” and so Europeans called them “turkeys.” Eventually, the word “turkey” came to describe M. gallopavo exclusively.

2. THEY NEARLY WENT EXTINCT.

By the early 20th century, the combination of overzealous hunting and habitat destruction had dwindled the turkey populations down to 30,000. With the help of conservationists, the turkey made a comeback. The birds are now so numerous that they’ve become a nuisance in some parts of the country.

3. THEY’VE GOT TWO STOMACHS.

Like all birds, turkeys don’t have teeth, so they’ve got to enlist some extra help to break down their food. Each swallowed mouthful goes first into a chamber called a proventriculus, which uses stomach acid to start softening the food. From there, food travels to the gizzard, where specialized muscles smash it into smaller pieces.

4. FEMALE TURKEYS DON’T GOBBLE.

Turkeys of both sexes purr, whistle, cackle, and yelp, but only the males gobble. A gobble is the male turkey’s version of a lion’s roar, announcing his presence to females and warning his rivals to stay away. To maximize the range of their calls, male turkeys often gobble from the treetops.

5. THEY SLEEP IN TREES.

Due to their deliciousness, turkeys have a lot of natural predators. As the sun goes down, the turkeys go up—into the trees. They start by flying onto a low branch, then clumsily hop their way upward, branch by branch, until they reach a safe height.

6. BOTH MALE AND FEMALE TURKEYS HAVE WATTLES.

The wattle is the red dangly bit under the turkey’s chin. The red thing on top of the beak is called a snood. Both sexes have those, too, but they’re more functional in male turkeys. Studies have shown that female turkeys prefer mates with longer snoods, which may indicate health and good genes.

7. THEY HAVE REALLY GOOD VISION.

Turkey eyes are really, really sharp. On top of that, they’ve got terrific peripheral vision. We humans can only see about 180 degrees, but given the placement of their eyes on the sides of their heads, turkeys can see 270 degrees. They’ve also got way better color vision than we do and can see ultraviolet light.

8. THEY’RE FAST ON THE GROUND, TOO.

You wouldn’t guess it by looking at them, but turkeys can really book it when they need to. We already know they’re fast in the air; on land, a running turkey can reach a speed of up to 25 mph—as fast as a charging elephant.

9. THEY’RE SMART … BUT NOT THAT SMART.

Turkeys can recognize each other by sound, and they can visualize a map of their territory. They can also plan ahead and recognize patterns. In other ways, they’re very, very simple animals. Male turkeys will attack anything that looks remotely like a threat, including their own reflections in windows and car doors.

10. IN THE EVENT OF A TURKEY ATTACK, CALL THE POLICE.

They might look silly, but a belligerent turkey is no joke. Male turkeys work very hard to impress other turkeys, and what could be more impressive than attacking a bigger animal? Turkey behavior experts advise those who find themselves in close quarters with the big birds to call the police if things get mean. Until the authorities arrive, they say, your best bet is to make yourself as big and imposing as you possibly can.


November 22, 2016 – 6:00pm

Everything New Coming to Netflix in December

Image credit: 
Netflix

Between the holidays and all that vacation time you’ve got to use before you lose it, December is a wonderful time for getting cozy on the sofa and turning your day into a movie marathon. And Netflix has got plenty of fresh content to keep you busy through the new year. Here’s everything new that’s coming to Netflix next month.

December 1

Always (1989)
Angels in the Snow (2015)
Beverly Hills Cop (1984)
Beyond Bollywood (2014)
Black Snake Moan (2007)
Chill with Bob Ross: Collection (1990)
Compulsion (1959)
D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994)
David Blaine: Street Magic (1997)
Dreamland (2010)
For the Love of Spock (2016)
Girlfriends’ Guide to Divorce: Season 2 (2015)
Glory Daze: The Life and Time of Michael Alig (2016)
Harry and the Hendersons (1987)
Hitler: A Career (1977)
Holiday Engagement (2011)
Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)
House of Wax (2006)
Hannibal (2001)
Merli: Season 1
Merry Kissmas (2015)
National Lampoon’s Animal House (1978)
Picture Perfect (1997)
Rainbow Time (2016)
Rodeo & Juliet (2015)
Swept Under (2016)
Switchback (1997)
The Angry Birds Movie (2016)
The Crucible (1996)
The Little Rascals (1994)
The Legend of Bagger Vance (2000)
The Rock (1996)
The Spirit of Christmas (2015)
Toys (1992)
Uncle Nick (2015)
Waking Life (2001)
Way of the Dragon (1972)
We’re Back! A Dinosaur’s Story (1993)
White Girl (2016)
Wildflower (2016)
Zero Point (2014)

December 2

Fauda: Season 1
Hip Hop Evolution: Season 1
Pacific Heat: Season 1

December 3

Lost & Found Music Studios: Season 2

December 5

Mad (2016)
The Good Neighbor (2016)

December 6

Blue Jay (2016)
Homeland (Iraq Year Zero): Season 1
Reggie Watts: Spatial
The Devil Dolls (2016)
The Model (2016)

December 8

The Cuba Libre Story: Season 1

December 9

Captive: Season 1
Cirque du Soleil Junior – Luna Petunia: Season 1
Club de Cuervos: Season 1
Fuller House: Season 2
Four Seasons in Havana: Season 1
Medici: Masters of Florence: Season 1
Spectral
White Rabbit Project: Season 1

December 10

Lucky Number Slevin (2006)
Phantom of the Theater (2016)

December 11

Breaking a Monster (2016)

December 12

Ricardo O’Farrill: Christmas Special

December 13

Colony: Season 1
Killswitch (2016)
I Am Not a Serial Killer (2016)
Nobel: Season 1

December 14

Versailles: Season 1 (2015)

December 16

Barry (2016)
Call Me Francis: Season 1
Crazyhead: Season 1
No Second Chance: Season 1
Rats (2016)
The Adventures of Puss in Boots: Season 4

December 19

Miss Stevens (2016)

December 20

Disorder (2015)
Gabriel Iglesias: Sorry For What I Said When I Was Hungry
My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic: Season 6 (2016)
Ten Percent: Season 1
The Break: Season 1

December 23

Travelers: Season 1
Trollhunters: Season 1

December 25

Marvel’s Captain America: Civil War (2016)
When Hari Got Married (2013)

December 27

Ajin: Season 2
Chasing Cameron: Season 1

December 28

Comedy Bang! Bang!: Season 5 (2016)

December 29

The Hollywood Shorties (2016)

December 30

The Eighties: Season 1 (2016)

December 31

Big in Bollywood (2011)


November 21, 2016 – 11:30am

5 Things We Know About Season 2 of ‘The Crown’

Image credit: 
Netflix

Since making its premiere on November 4, The Crown has become an indisputable hit for Netflix. The 10-part series, created by two-time Oscar nominee Peter Morgan (The Queen, Frost/Nixon), follows the ascension and early reign of Queen Elizabeth II (played by Claire Foy) and the challenges it creates in her personal life, particularly in her marriage to Prince Philip (played by former Doctor Who star Matt Smith). As the streaming channel’s latest binge-worthy offering, fans are already clamoring for details on the second season. Here’s what we know.

1. YES, THERE WILL BE A SECOND SEASON.

Just days after the first season of The Crown dropped, Netflix confirmed that it would be returning for a second season. Though there’s no official release date, all sources point to a similar premiere time frame, in October or November of 2017.

2. PRODUCTION ON SEASON TWO BEGAN BEFORE SEASON ONE PREMIERED.

Last week, while speaking on a panel for the nonprofit organization Visionary Women, Netflix’s chief content officer Ted Sarandos confirmed that production on the show’s second season is already underway. “We’re in production now on the second season,” Sarandos said. “This is going to take Queen Elizabeth from age 29 to, presumably, the current day. We’ll see it lay out over decades. We’ve seen a lot of things about Queen Elizabeth, but we’ve already learned more about her than we ever had by watching the first 10 hours.”

In an interview with Vanity Fair, published on November 18, Foy revealed that they were already a month into shooting. “We literally pick up where we left off—in 1956,’’ she said. “I think Peter’s taking [us up to] ’63 or ’64. We get into the 60s, and it is a whole other world happening. It’s really exciting, especially because we’ve had such a positive response and everyone’s been really encouraging. It just makes everybody, especially the crew, work even harder. When we first started shooting, and it hadn’t come out. We were like, ‘Oh god, what if they hate it?’ And then we’ll [still have to film a second season] knowing that everyone hated it.”

3. SEASON TWO WILL FOCUS ON THE SUEZ CRISIS.

Season two will focus largely on the Suez Crisis of 1956. “Initially, I thought this would only be three seasons,” Morgan told The Hollywood Reporter. “It would be one season of her as the Young Queen, one season of her as the Middle-Aged Queen, one season of her as an Old Queen. It’s only in the writing of it that I said, ‘Oh, my God I need more time.’ The truth of the matter is, I could’ve written three or even four seasons of her as the Young Queen. I did get to the point where I thought, ‘Actually no, let’s leave it on the knife’s edge of Suez because Suez feels like a changing point for the country. Britain was never the same again after Suez.’ Therefore, I was going to deal with that at the beginning of season two. Which we do.”

4. NETFLIX WOULD LIKE TO SEE A TOTAL OF SIX SEASONS.

Though it’s the most expensive production (so far) in Netflix’s history, Sarandos seems rather pleased with the results of The Crown—and the audience’s reaction to it. Even if season two does bring viewers up to the present day, the series won’t stop there. In fact, from the get-go, Netflix saw the series as a long-term investment. “The idea is to do this over six decades, in six seasons presumably, and make the whole show over eight to 10 years,” Sarandos said.

For his part, Morgan isn’t able to look beyond season two at the moment. “I cannot think beyond season two and I’m not going to think beyond season two,” he told The Hollywood Reporter. “Of course by virtue of the fact that we continue to have Prime Ministers and the Queen has continued to stay alive and on the throne, there is a possibility of further material … The agreement I made with Netflix is that I would wait and see how the show was received before ever considering continuing. Because there’s simply no point in continuing unless what you’re doing has somehow connected or punched through at a significant level. It’s simply too overwhelming a commitment. I haven’t thought for one second about future seasons because I’m almost living in denial of the possibility of this continuing.”

5. FUTURE SEASONS COULD SEE SOME MAJOR CAST CHANGES.

Though Foy and Smith are both back for season two of The Crown, it will reportedly be their last. Because of the chronological nature of the narrative, seasons three and beyond would focus on the Queen in the later years of her reign, which would require an older actress. According to Digital Spy, if all six seasons of the series shake out as planned, the cast will change for season three then again in season five, for the final two seasons. Producer Andrew Eaton said that he and the rest of the team have had some “conversations” about who might play the royal couple next, but right now they are firmly focused on Foy.

“We saw a number of actresses in the beginning [to play the young Elizabeth] who were all brilliant, but Claire … there was something about her,” Eaton said.

“If you’re going to take this character—and she’s doing all of the first two seasons, so it’s 20 hours with the same character—it’s got to be someone that you can identify with and feels vulnerable and sympathetic and she has that quality as a person.”

The Crown is streaming now on Netflix.


November 21, 2016 – 2:00am

How Do Antibiotics Work?

filed under: medicine
Image credit: 
iStock

How do antibiotics work?

Drew Smith:

Antibiotics have been around for a long time now, and we know which bacterial proteins they attack. ß-lactams like amoxicillin inhibit the enzyme that crosslinks peptidoglycans in bacterial cell walls. Fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin bind DNA topoisomerases and prevent them from coiling and uncoiling bacterial chromosomes. But so what? How does blocking these processes actually kill bacterial cells?

It turns out that we really don’t know a lot about how antibiotics actually kill bacteria, although we are beginning to get some clues.

One of these clues is that some antibiotics require bacterial protein synthesis in order to be effective: inhibition of protein synthesis reduces the lethality of ß-lactams, for instance. Simply blocking cell wall synthesis does not lead to rapid and complete killing of bacteria—something more is required.

Further research shows that antibiotics induce bacterial stress responses, and it is these responses, rather than the immediate activity of the antibiotics, which lead to cell death. In fact, a unified theory of antibiotic-induced cell death is beginning to emerge in which several classes of antibiotics work through a common mechanism.

Essentially, the stress response of cells to antibiotics causes disregulation of the carefully controlled membrane electrical potential. All cells generate chemical energy by pumping positively charged protons out of the cell, leaving an excess of negatively charged electrons within. The electrical potential created by this mechanism is enormous, as Nick Lane has pointed out; at the cellular scale, it is equivalent to a bolt of lightning.

Normally this power is used to turn a turbine-like molecular assembly (ATP synthase) that converts electrical energy into chemical energy. But when the flow of power is disrupted, a storm of highly reactive electrons is let loose in the cell, where they destroy everything—proteins, DNA, RNA.

We don’t yet understand all the steps that make this happen. That blue box in the figure which says “Metabolic Feedback” is really a black box. But this research should surely lead to new strategies for designing antibiotics and suppressing the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

This post originally appeared on Quora. Click here to view.


November 18, 2016 – 3:00pm

Lexus Created a Sriracha-Inspired Car, and It Comes With a Trunk Full of Hot Sauce

filed under: Cars, Food, weird
Image credit: 

Lexus delivered one hot car for the Los Angeles Auto Show. According to Eater, the auto manufacturer teamed up with Huy Fong Foods to create the 2017 Sriracha Lexus IS, a hot sauce-inspired, entry-level luxury car.

Designed and created in just about three months, Lexus turned to the world-famous West Coast Customs to create the one-off custom car in order to spice things up for the event. Lexus promises that the car has “Sriracha in everything,” from its red-hot paint job with green accents to its “Hot Handling” steering wheel.

The hot chili sauce car also features a temperature control dial that goes from cool to “Sriracha Hot,” along with leather seats embroidered with the iconic Huy Fong Foods rooster logo. If that’s not enough hot sauce for you, it even comes equipped with 43 bottles of Sriracha in its trunk and a Sriracha-dispensing key fob for an emergency spice kick.

“We wanted to work with the original and were pleased that David Tran at Huy Fong Foods was open to collaborating with us,” Mariko Kusumoto, Lexus’s national marketing communications manager, said. “If you’re a fan of Sriracha, you know that the rooster bottle, green cap, and pure spiciness can’t be replicated and fans of the rooster sauce won’t settle for anything bland. It was a perfect pairing. This is our first food-inspired car and don’t have any other foodie cars planned right now.”

The Sriracha Lexus IS will be on display at the Los Angeles Convention Center from November 18 to 27, but the car company has no plans to sell or put the car up for auction at the moment.

[h/t Eater]


November 17, 2016 – 6:30pm